USPTO serial 78254766
KOALA BLUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KOALA BLUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BP 182, Monte Carlo, MC
BP 182, Monte Carlo, MC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard W. Young
Richard W. Young Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP191 N. Wacker DriveSuite 3700Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | (Based on 44(e)) peanut butter; processed or treated peanuts, namely toasted, roasted, boiled and salted peanuts; (Based on Intent to Use) preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, marmalade, compotes; edible oils and fats; potato chips; butter, margarine; salads prepared from vegetables or fruit; fish products, namely fish fillets, tinned fish, preserved fish and salted fish; seafood products, namely prawns, scallops, crabs, crayfish, lobsters, shellfish and shrimp, soup preparations; milk, cheese, cream, yogurt | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | (Based on 44(e)) chocolate, chocolates, candy; ice cream; frozen confections; biscuits; wafers; cakes; pastries; (Based on Intent to Use) coffee, tea, cocoa; beverages made from coffee, tea or cocoa; flour, bread, buns; honey; treacle; mustard, vinegar, sauces, condiments, savory sauces, relishes, salad dressings; processed herbs, spices; flavored ices; muesli, muesli bars, breakfast cereals; puddings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 7, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |