USPTO serial 78254833
MY INPHONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MY INPHONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Beth M. Goldman
BETH M GOLDMAN HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE LLP333 BUSH STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-2878UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing telephone numbers, pager numbers, facsimile numbers, names and addresses, URL's and electronic mail addresses; providing information about products or services associated with businesses and business names; maintaining computer database files containing individuals' and/or businesses' customized collections of communications information such as addresses, telephone, pager and fax numbers, e-mail addresses, URL's, contact lists, and credit card numbers; providing CONSUMER information about and making referrals for retail services concerning products, services, events, activities, attractions and facilities in particular geographic locations; looking up and providing information about businesses closest to target geographical location; providing information about the goods and services of others via telephone; providing consumer products and services information via telephone | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 8, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |