USPTO serial 78255187
FAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
6331 Hünenberg, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Epstein
JEFFREY H EPSTEIN COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOUND, VIDEO RECEIVERS FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF SURVEILLANCE AND SECURITY; APPARATUS FOR RECORDING,TRANSMISSION OR REPRODUCTION OF SOUND AND IMAGES, NAMELY DIGITAL VIDEO RECORDERS FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF SURVEILLANCE AND SECURITY,NET WORKABLE VIDEO HARD DISC RECORDERS FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF SURVEILLANCE AND SECURITY, VIDEO MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS CONSISTING OF BLANK DIGITAL IMAGE MEMORY CARRIER, BLANK DIGITAL AUDIO AND VIDEO DISCS, BLANK DVDs, COMPACT DISCS FEATURING SURVEILLANCE AND SECURITY TECHNOLOGY, OPTICAL DATA MEDIA, NAMELY CDs AND HARD DISKS FEATURING~INFORMATION RELATING TO SECURITY AND SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN DATABASE MANAGEMENT IN THE FIELD OF SURVEILLANCE AND SECURITY TECHNOLOGY; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATABASE MANAGEMENT IN THE FIELD OF SURVEILLANCE AND SECURITY TECHNOLOGY; COMPUTER OPERATING PROGRAMS FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF SURVEILLANCE AND SECURITY; DATA PROCESSORS FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF SURVEILLANCE AND SECURITY; PHOTO TELEGRAPHY APPARATUS, NAMELY PHOTOCOPYING MACHINES FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF SURVEILLANCE AND SECURITY | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | TRAINING IN THE USE AND OPERATION OF SURVEILLANCE AND SECURITY TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT; TRAINING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF SURVEILLANCE AND SECURITY TECHNOLOGY | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF SURVEILLANCE AND SECURITY | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | SECURITY AND SURVEILLANCE CONSULTANCY, NAMELY CONSULTATION ABOUT MONITORING COMPUTER SYSTEMS FOR SECURITY PURPOSES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fast Video Security AG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named FAST
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |