USPTO serial 78255573
CIMARRON NANAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CIMARRON NANAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MELOPHONE - CONSULTORES E SERVICOS, LDA.
9000-039 FUNCHAL (Madeira), PT
Other trademarks owned by MELOPHONE - CONSULTORES E SERVICOS, LDA.
MELOPHONE - CONSULTORES E SERVICOS, LDA.
9000-039 FUNCHAL (Madeira), PT
Other trademarks owned by MELOPHONE - CONSULTORES E SERVICOS, LDA.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles P. LaPolla
Charles P. LaPolla OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN, LLP1180 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Stickers, note books, envelopes, business paper pads, writing paper, fountain pens, ball-point pens, pencils, rubber erasers, loose-leaf binders, writing case sets containing stationery, pens and pencils, folders for papers, pencil sharpeners, pencil holders, boxes for pens, pencil cases paper bags for packaging, plastic bags for packaging, yearbooks, diaries, phone books, clothing and accessories catalogs | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Portable cosmetic cases sold empty; leather key cases, all purpose sports bags for mountain-climbing; backpacks, purses not of precious metal; beach bags; briefcases; suitcases, credit card cases; traveling bags; traveling trunks; passport cases; leather bags for packaging; school bags, handbags; parasols; umbrellas; and leather straps | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Leather shoes, galoshes, half-boots, sandals, slippers, sneakers, long coats, shorts, half coats, suits, skirts, slacks, anoraks not for exercising; trousers, overcoats, jackets, jumpers, blue jeans, parkas, frocks, bathing gowns, blouses, underwear, swimming suits, sweaters, sweatshirts, nightwear, namely, pajamas, night dresses, night gowns, dressing gowns, negliges, night shirts and baby doll lingerie, jerseys, vests, cardigans, tanktops, poloshirts, pullovers, T-shirts, scarves, hats and belts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MELOPHONE - CONSULTORES E SERVICOS, LDA.
- Other trademarks owned by MELOPHONE - CONSULTORES E SERVICOS, LDA.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named CIMARRON NANAS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |