Drawing for SWIFT INTEGRATED GENETICS

USPTO serial 78255836

SWIFT INTEGRATED GENETICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SWIFT INTEGRATED GENETICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda G. Alvarez

LINDA G ALVAREZ VINSON & ELKINS LLP2300 FIRST CITY TWR1001 FANNINHOUSTON, TX 77002-6760

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035procurement services, namely, purchasing feeder cattle for othersACTIVE—
042scientific laboratory services, namely, genetic evaluation and analysis of animalsACTIVE—
044animal husbandry services, namely, animal genetic evaluation and analysis, custom cattle feeding, collecting data and providing information to others in the field of animal genetics, animal husbandry, and animal feedingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 8, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 26, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 26, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 20, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance