USPTO serial 78256208
ALWAYS CRISP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2990739Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 30, 2005
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ALWAYS CRISP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DIEPPE, CA
DIEPPE, CA
GRAND FOREST HOLDINGS INCORPORATED
DIEPPE, NEW BRUNSWICK, CA
Other trademarks owned by GRAND FOREST HOLDINGS INCORPORATED
GRAND FOREST HOLDINGS INCORPORATED
DIEPPE, NEW BRUNSWICK, CA
Other trademarks owned by GRAND FOREST HOLDINGS INCORPORATED
St. John, New Brunswick, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
P. Scott Maclean
P. Scott Maclean CASSAN MACLEAN307 GILMOUR STREETOTTAWA, ONTARIO, K2P0P7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | frozen french fries[ and other frozen potato products, namely, potato patties, potato nuggets, potato crowns, potato logs, hash browns and mashed potatoes] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 15, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CAVENDISH FARMS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by CAVENDISH FARMS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by GRAND FOREST HOLDINGS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by GRAND FOREST HOLDINGS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by Irving Pulp & Paper, Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named ALWAYS CRISP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |