USPTO serial 78256227
RENOLD SECCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 24, 2007
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RENOLD SECCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Manchester, England, GB
Manchester, England, GB
Manchester, England, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rex A. Donnelly
REX A DONNELLY RATNERPRESTIASTE 1100 1007 ORANGE STPO BOX 1596WILMINGTON, DE 19899Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine and machine tool parts, namely, cam drives for internal combustion engines; power transmissions and parts thereof not for land vehicles; gears and gear boxes and parts thereof; driving chains; conveying chains; chain clutches; chain couplings; chain racks and pinions; counter weight chains and pinions in combination; speed change drives; speed change gears; chain cases and splash guards; chain tension adjusters; chain guides; chain wheel cutters; chain grinding machines; mortise chains; guide bars and sprocket wheels for use with mortise chains; power transmission chains; chain wheels; flexible couplings; tooth, and milling cutter chains; chain guard castings; toothed wheels for chain drivers; toothed wheels for driving chains; block chains; galle chains; polymer and rubber block chains; chain joints; fenders and mudguards for machines; driver chain wheels and chain wheels; chains for runways; escalator chains; wringing nails; conveyor belts; toothed belts and toothed wheels for machines; transmission wheels; chained toothed couplings; sprag clutches; crank couplings; electro-magnetic, mechanical and hydraulic clutches and parts thereof; push-pull remote controls and chain speed transformers; auto-adjusters for chains; roller chains; bushless roller chains; axle machine parts; direct drive dog clutches; overriding clutches for machines; shifting clutches for machines; flyback suppressors for machines; inverted tooth type chain gears and wheels; inverted tooth type chains; chain finishers; elastic couplings; torque limiters; conveyors for agricultural and horticultural machinery and parts thereof, plastic chains; plastic roller and bushless chains; plastic conveyor type chains; steel and plastic tabletop and slat band type chains; pine kernels and ratchets for chains; spigot pins; stay bars; roller chains and metal tubing for controlling mechanisms; connecting pins, joints and components for chains; axle pivots; spacer bars; dentent chains; and electrical driven tools for roller and block chains; Land vehicle parts, namely, automotive cam drives for motor vehicles; cam drives for internal combustion engines; chain wheel cutting machines and chain grinding machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Land vehicle parts, namely, power transmission and parts thereof, gears and gear boxes and parts thereof, driving chains, conveying chains, chain clutches, chain couplings, chain racks and pinions, counter weight chains and pinions in combination, speed change drives, speed change gears, chain cases and splash guards, chain tension adjusters, chain guides, mortise chains, guide bars and sprocket wheels for use with mortise chains, power transmission chains, chain wheels, flexible couplings, chain guard castings, toothed wheels for chain drivers, toothed wheels for driving chains, block chains, chain joints, fenders and mudguards, driver chainwheels and chainwheels, wringing nails, transmission wheels, chained toothed couplings, sprag clutches, crank couplings, electro-magnetic, mechanical and hydraulic clutches and parts thereof, push-pull remote controls and chain speed transformers, auto adjusters for chains, direct drive dog clutches, inverted tooth type chain gears, inverted tooth type chains, chain finishers, elastic couplings, torque limiters, pine kernels and ratchets for chains, spigot pins, stay bars, roller chains and metal tubing for controlling mechanisms, connecting pins, joints and components for chains, axle pivots, spacer bars and dentent chains, toothed belts and toothed wheels, roller chains, bushless chains; and fork lift truck parts, namely chains, links, connectors, anchor bolts and wheels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Renold Public Limited Company
- Other trademarks owned by Renold Public Limited Company
- Other trademarks owned by Renold Public Limited Company
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named RENOLD SECCO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 8, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | 44DA | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |