Drawing for KME

USPTO serial 78256313

KME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine S. Collins

CATHERINE S COLLINS VAN DYKE, GARDNER, LINN & BURKHART LLPPO BOX 888695GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49588-8695UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005PHARMACEUTICAL AND VETERINARY PREPARATIONS IN WHICH THE PHARMACEUTICALLY OR VETERINARILY ACTIVE AGENT IS A KNOWN CHEMICAL ENTITY, NAMELY, NATURAL, SEMI-SYNTHETIC AND SYNTHETIC STEROIDS AND THEIR DERIVATIVES, NON-STEROIDAL ESTROGENS AND MIXTURES THEREOF; A- AND B- ADRENERGIC AGONISTS AND BLOCKERS; ALCOHOL DETERRANTS; ALDOSE REDUCTASE INHIBITORS; NARCOTIC AND NON-NARCOTIC; ANALGESIC ANESTHETICS; ANOREXICS; ANTI-ACNE AGENTS; ANTI ALLERGICS; ANTIANDROGENS AND ANTIESTROGENS; ANTIANGINALS; ANTIARRHYTHMICS; ANTIARTERIOSCLEROTICS; ANTIARTHRITIC/ANTIRHEUMATTCS; ANTIBACTERIAL AGENTS; ANTICONVULSANTS; ANTIDEPRESSANTS; ANTIDIABETICS; ANTIDIARRHEAL AGENTS; ANTIDIURETICS; ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS; ANTIGLAUCOMA AGENTS; ANTIGONADOTROPINS; ANTIHISTAMINES ANTIHYPERLIPOPROTEINEMICS; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS; ANTIHYPOTENSIVE AGENTS; NON-STEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AGENTS; ANTIMIGRAINE AGENTS; ANTINAUSEANT AGENTS; ANTINEOPLATICS AGENTS AND ADJUNCTS; ANTIPARKINSONIAN AGENTS; ANTIHYPERPROSTATIC AGENTS; ANTIPURITICS; ANTIPSORIATIC AGENTS; ANTIPSYCHOTIC AGENTS; ANTIPYRETICS; ANTISPASMODIC AGENTS; ANTITHROMBOTIC AGENTS; ANTITUSSIVE AGENTS; ANTIULCERATIVE AGENTS; ANTIUROLITHIC AGENTS; ANTIVRAL AGENTS; ANXIOLYTIC AGENTS; BENZODIAZEPINE ANTAGONISTS; BRONCHODILATORS; CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS; CARDTOTONICS; CHOLINERGIC AGENTS; CHOLINESTERASE INHIBITORS AND REACTIVATORS; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS AND AGENTS; DECONGESTANTS; DIURETICS; DOPAMINE RECEPTOR AGONISTS; HEPATIC ENZYME INDUCERS; GASTRIC SECRETION INHIBITORS; GLUCOCORTICOIDS; GONAD-STIMULATING AGENTS AND GONADOTROPIC HORMONES; HEPARIN ANTAGONISTS; HEPATOPROTECTANTS; IMMUNOMODULATORS AND IMMUNOSUPPRESSANTS LH-RH AGONISTS; LIPOTROPIC AGENTS; MINERALOCORTICOIDS; MONOAMINE OXIDASE INHIBITORS; MUCOLYTIC AGENTS; MUSCLE RELAXANTS; NARCOTIC ANTAGONISTS; NEUROPROTECTiVE AGENTS; NOOTROPICAL AGENTS; OPHTHALMIC AGENTS; PERISTALTIC STIMULANTS; PROLACTIN INHIBITORS; PROSTAGLANDINS AND THEIR ANALOGS; PROTEASE INHIBITORS; RESPIRATORY STIMULANTS; SCLEROSING AGENTS; SEDATIVES AND HYPNOTICS; THROMBOLYTIC AGENTS; URICOSURICS; CEREBRAL, CORONARY AND PERIPHERAL VASODILATORS; VASOPROTECTANTS; ANTICOAGULANTS; HEMATINICS; AGENTS FOR BENIGN PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY, MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND URINARY INCONTINENCEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 13, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 1, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 1, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 28, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 7, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 10, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 2, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2004REINREINSTATED—
Jun 16, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 31, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance