Drawing for PATRON SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 78256314

PATRON SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PATRON SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Camille M. Miller

CAMILLE M MILLER COZEN O'CONNOR, PC1900 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035business management consulting services in the fields of leisure, sports, conventions, theater and entertainment; operation of telephone call centers for others in the fields of sports and entertainment ticket sales; integrated tracking and management of commercial transactions relating to the purchase of tickets, merchandise, food and beverages and parking at entertainment and sports venues on a global computer networkACTIVEJul 14, 2003
041arranging for ticket reservations and sales for shows, conventions, sporting events, and other arts and entertainment eventsACTIVEJul 14, 2003
042application service provider (ASP) featuring software for ticket sales and database management software for leisure, sports, arts, theater and general entertainment industries; application service provider (ASP) hosting computer software applications for othersACTIVEJul 14, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 26, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 14, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 2003AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 22, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 25, 2003AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance