USPTO serial 78256372
P90X PEAK PERFORMANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with P90X PEAK PERFORMANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Camille M. Miller
CAMILLE M MILLER COZEN O'CONNOR, PC1900 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | nutritional and dietary supplements in the form of protein-based, nutrient-dense snack bars | ACTIVE | Jul 21, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |