USPTO serial 78256568
POLY LAWN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 21, 2005
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with POLY LAWN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
James D. Breeden and Tami Horton Partnership, The
San Diego, CA
Other trademarks owned by James D. Breeden and Tami Horton Partnership, The
James D. Breeden and Tami Horton Partnership, The
San Diego, CA
Other trademarks owned by James D. Breeden and Tami Horton Partnership, The
James D. Breeden and Tami Horton Partnership, The
San Diego, CA
Other trademarks owned by James D. Breeden and Tami Horton Partnership, The
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John D. Buchaca
Denise E. Jones Charmasson, Buchaca & Leach, LLP2635 Camino Del Rio SouthSuite 102San Diego, CA 92108Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | artificial turf | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 28, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by James D. Breeden and Tami Horton Partnership, The
- Other trademarks owned by James D. Breeden and Tami Horton Partnership, The
- Other trademarks owned by James D. Breeden and Tami Horton Partnership, The
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named POLY LAWN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |