Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78256581?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78256581. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns SYBERVISION?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78256581, the listed owner(s) include: SyberVision.

What is USPTO serial number 78256581?

Serial number 78256581 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark SYBERVISION. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover SYBERVISION?

The public record lists International Classes: 009. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

USPTO serial 78256581

SYBERVISION

Q: What is the current status of SYBERVISION?

SYBERVISION (78256581) currently shows USPTO status code 614 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614

Filing date: May 31, 2003
Status date: Aug 17, 2006
Registration date: —
Examiner: CARROLL, DORITT
Law office: PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYBERVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

SyberVision
Orem, UT
Other trademarks owned by SyberVision

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
009	Prerecorded analog and/or digital audio and video tapes/disks featuring instruction in the field of personal, business, and social skills improvement	ACTIVE	Jan 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Aug 17, 2006	PETD	PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED	—
Jul 27, 2006	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Jul 27, 2006	FAXX	FAX RECEIVED	—
Jul 27, 2006	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Oct 31, 2005	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 29, 2005	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 29, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Apr 2, 2005	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2005	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Feb 18, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Feb 18, 2005	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2005	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Feb 18, 2005	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Jan 24, 2005	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 24, 2005	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 24, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Jun 11, 2004	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 5, 2004	EMRV	EMAIL RECEIVED	—
May 4, 2004	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 3, 2003	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2003	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—