Drawing for HEADSUP ON DIABETES

USPTO serial 78256627

HEADSUP ON DIABETES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEADSUP ON DIABETES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Humphrey

STEPHEN L HUMPHREY CAMERON & HORNBOSTEL LLPSTE 700818 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 22302

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Health promotion services, namely, providing information regarding signs, symptoms, risk factors and preventative measures pertaining diabetes through booklets, the Internet, printed and electronic newsletters and electronic mail, radio, television, telephone, newspapers, web sites, video discs, audio tapes, live exhibitions and in-person; providing information on diet, exercise and weight management as they pertain to preventing and mitigating the effects of heart diabetesACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 28, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTEDโ€”
Jan 25, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITIONโ€”
Jan 25, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTEDโ€”
Jan 25, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVEDโ€”
Dec 28, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 20, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILEDโ€”
Apr 11, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTEDโ€”
Apr 11, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILEDโ€”
Apr 11, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 2, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTEDโ€”
Oct 20, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILEDโ€”
Oct 20, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 20, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDโ€”
Apr 20, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDโ€”
Apr 20, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 15, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Oct 5, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Oct 5, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 20, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Nov 28, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Oct 24, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVEDโ€”
Oct 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Oct 22, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance