Drawing for SOPHOS ENTERPRISE MANAGER

USPTO serial 78256884

SOPHOS ENTERPRISE MANAGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOPHOS ENTERPRISE MANAGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Erika K. Mikkelsen, Esq.

ERIKA K MIKKELSEN ESQ PATTERSON BELKNAP WEBB1133 AVE OF THE AMERICAS FL 22NEW YORK, NY 10036-6731UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and computer programs for automating the downloading of software from the Internet; computer software and computer programs for software management, namely, software for computer configuration and report generation; data storage media, namely, pre-recorded CD-ROM for the storing of computer programs; pre-recorded CD-ROM bearing recorded computer programs for computer configuration; material in electronic form, namely, downloadable electronic magazines, books, and manuals featuring information and advice relating to computer software management supplied on-line from databases or from websites or other facilities provided on the InternetACTIVE—
016Instruction manuals for use with computer software operations and containing technical supportACTIVE—
042Computer software consultation, namely, professional advisory services relating to computer software; leasing and rental of computer software; technical support, namely, information and advice relating to computer software management and management systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 25, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 16, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance