USPTO serial 78257158
HD CATARACT SURGERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3641153Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 16, 2009
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HD CATARACT SURGERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Russellville, AR
Russellville, AR
Russellville, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Charles Dougherty
J CHARLES DOUGHERTY WRIGHT, LINDSEY & JENNINGS LLP200 W CAPITOL AVESTE 2300LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201-3699Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | ophthalmic services, namely, cataract removal and ocular implantation services, such services not employing high-definition cameras, monitors, or technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 12, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 13, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |