USPTO serial 78257434
GESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Glimakra, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd Deveau
TODD DEVEAU THOMAS, KAYDEN, HORSTEMEYER & RISLEY LLPSTE 1750100 GALLERIA PKWY NWATLANTA, GA 30339-5948Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for bakeries, namely dough handling machines, spiral mixers, bowl lifters, bulk hoppers, dough containers with dough dividers, cone rounders, belt rounders, elevators, cup elevators, prover/conveyors, molders, bun dividers/rounders, baguette molders, rusk dividers/snappers, pullers, provers, depanners, dough and bread conveyors,and tearing machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Dosage dispensers, namely dispensers that measure output for use with water, flour, and yeast; apparatuses for measuring, namely bevels and measuring cups; registered computer programs, namely software to control production and generate production reports for use in bakeries; elevator operating apparatuses, electricity control panels and electric regulating apparatuses, namely electrical and electromechanical controls for controlling machines for use in bakeries; quantity indicators, namely displays for indicating quantity of product in dough dividers, rounders, and provers; scales; volume indicators, namely displays for indicating volume of dough, flour, and water used in machines for bakeries; electric monitoring apparatuses, namely electric power supplies and meters for machines for use in bakeries | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Machines for bakeries in the form of intermediate pocket provers for dough resting; and apparatuses for heating, cooling and drying, namely, pocket provers, refrigerators, commercial bakery ovens and dryers for resting, cooling, humidification and heating of dough | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |