USPTO serial 78257752
DUAL GRADIENT SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUAL GRADIENT SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Tidwell
Mark Tidwell Haynes and Boone, LLP2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700IP SectionDallas, TX 75219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Oil field mud management services, namely controlling drilling mud properties and drilling mud flow for downhole drilling operations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |