Drawing for AL UNSER

USPTO serial 78257866

AL UNSER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AL UNSER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Theodore S. Maceiko

PATENT PROSECUTION DEPT JONES DAYFIFTIETH FL555 S FLOWER STLOS ANGELES, CA 90071

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting the goods and services of others, namely endorsing the goods and services of others through the racing or driving of automobiles or other vehicles through personal public appearances and promotional eventsACTIVE—
041Entertainment in the nature of racing, namely automobile racing, and racing and competitions involving motorized or other vehicles, namely automobiles, trucks, snowmobiles and motorcyclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 28, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 6, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 24, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 24, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 28, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 5, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 15, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 3, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 3, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 15, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance