USPTO serial 78258674
POLAR FIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POLAR FIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Whitehorse, Yukon, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard Sobelman
HOWARD SOBELMAN SNELL & WILMER LLPONE ARIZONA CTR 400 E VAN BURENPHOENIX, AZ 85004-2202UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |