Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78258768?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78258768. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns SAVAGE: THE BATTLE FOR NEWERTH?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78258768, the listed owner(s) include: S2 Games, LLC.

What is USPTO serial number 78258768?

Serial number 78258768 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark SAVAGE: THE BATTLE FOR NEWERTH. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of SAVAGE: THE BATTLE FOR NEWERTH?

SAVAGE: THE BATTLE FOR NEWERTH (78258768) currently shows USPTO status code 601 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover SAVAGE: THE BATTLE FOR NEWERTH?

The public record lists International Classes: 041. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

USPTO serial 78258768

SAVAGE: THE BATTLE FOR NEWERTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601

Filing date: Jun 5, 2003
Status date: Feb 28, 2006
Registration date: —
Examiner: ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAVAGE: THE BATTLE FOR NEWERTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

S2 Games, LLC
Kalamazoo, MI
Other trademarks owned by S2 Games, LLC

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas L. Lockhart

THOMAS L LOCKHART VARNUM, RIDDERING, SCHMIDT & HOWLETT LLP333 BRG ST NWGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49504UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
041	OPERATING A MULTI-PLAYER INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GAME PLAYED VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Feb 28, 2006	MAB1	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT	—
Feb 28, 2006	ABN1	ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED	—
Feb 27, 2006	EXAR	TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED	—
Aug 25, 2005	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 24, 2005	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 2005	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Aug 8, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Aug 8, 2005	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2005	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Jul 9, 2004	CNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED	—
Jun 15, 2004	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jun 15, 2004	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 15, 2004	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2003	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2003	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—