USPTO serial 78258893
HIMALAYAN GOJI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HIMALAYAN GOJI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven A. Richards
STEVEN A RICHARDS GRIMES & REESE, PLLC1270 S WOODRUFF AVEIDAHO FALLS, ID 83404-5544UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Personal care and cosmetic products, namely, non-medicated cleansing bars, lotions and gels; non-medicated skin, facial and hand nourishing moisturizers, creams and lotions; hair shampoos, hair conditioners and hair rinses; sun screens and after sun skin lotions | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Grain-based ready to eat nutritional food bars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |