USPTO serial 78258919
CORTERRA WINES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2982863Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 9, 2005
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CORTERRA WINES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Judith M. Schvimmer
Judith M. Schvimmer Corterra Wines, Inc.421 Aviation BlvdLegal Dept.Santa Rosa, CA 95403Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Wholesale ordering services in the field of wine | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Sep 27, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2012 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 31, 2012 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 23, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |