USPTO serial 78259060
VITALUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 15, 2009
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with VITALUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Abbotsford, BC, CA
CHRIST CHURCH, BB
CHRIST CHURCH, BB
St. Michael, BB
BELLINGHAM, WA, BB
CHRIST CHURCH, BB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynne E. Graybeal
Lynne E. Graybeal Perkins Coie LLPP.O. Box 2608SEATTLE, WA 98111United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | [ Whey protein concentrate for use in the manufacture of processed dairy products, meat products, animal feed, bakery products, dressings, sauces and soups, sport nutrition products, infant formula, functional foods and drinks; whey protein isolate for use in the manufacture of processed dairy products, meat products, animal feed, bakery products, dressings, sauces and soups, sport nutrition products, infant formula, snack foods, functional foods and drinks; ] milk proteins for use in the manufacture of processed dairy products, meat products, bakery products, dressings, sauces and soups, functional foods and drinks; milk protein fractions for use in the manufacture of infant formula, meat products, sports nutrition products [ ; enzymes extracted from dairy products for use in the manufacture of processed dairy products and oral hygiene products; enzymes extracted from dairy products for use in the manufacture of milk substitutes; enzymes extracted from dairy products for use as a chemical additive or food filler in the manufacture of food products ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | [ Whey protein concentrate for use as a nutritional ingredient in processed dairy products, meat products, animal feed, bakery products, dressings, sauces and soups, sport nutrition products, infant formula, snack foods, functional foods and drinks; whey protein isolate for use as a nutritional ingredient in processed dairy products, meat products, animal feed, bakery products, dressings, sauces and soups, sport nutrition products, infant formula, snack foods, functional foods and drinks; ] milk proteins for use as a nutritional ingredient in processed dairy products, meat products, bakery products, dressings, sauces and soups, functional foods and drinks; milk protein fractions for use as a nutritional ingredient in infant formula, meat products, sports nutrition products | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | [ Whey protein concentrate for use as a food additive or food filler; whey protein concentrate for use as a milk substitute in processed dairy products, animal feed, bakery products, dressings and sauces, and recombined dairy products; whey protein isolate for use as a food additive or food filler; whey protein isolate for use as a milk substitute in processed dairy products, animal feed, bakery products, dressings and sauces, and recombined dairy products; milk proteins for use as a food additive or food filler; ] milk proteins for use as a milk substitute in recombined dairy products; milk protein fractions for use as a food additive or food filler; milk protein fractions for use as a milk substitute [ ; enzymes extracted from dairy products for use as a nutritional ingredient in processed dairy products, and sold as component parts of finished dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | [ Enzymes extracted from dairy products for use as a nutritional ingredient in processed dairy products, and sold as component parts of finished dairy products, namely, ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VITALUS NUTRITION INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VITALUS INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VITALUS INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Inovatech Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by IC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by VITALUS INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named VITALUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 9, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 8, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 5, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 20, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |