USPTO serial 78260210
TESTBASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TESTBASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David O. Seeley
DAVID O SEELEY HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN299 S MAIN STE 1800SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical measuring systems and electrical test systems; measuring software and test software; databases, in particular for connection to measuring software and test software; the aforesaid goods for measuring and testing of electrical power engineering equipment and electrical power engineering components | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software; design and development of measuring hardware and test hardware as well as measuring software and test software; design and development of databases, in particular for connection to the aforesaid measuring software and test software; the aforesaid services in particular for measuring and testing of electrical power engineering equipment and electrical power engineering components | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |