USPTO serial 78260944
SMARTRISK HEROES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3534105Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 18, 2008
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMARTRISK HEROES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis K. Ebling
LOUIS K EBLING Thompson Hine LLP312 Walnut Street, Suite 1400Cincinnati, OH 45202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded audiocassettes, videocassettes and digital discs; pre-recorded audiocassettes, videocassettes and digital discs; all featuring information on risk assessment and injury prevention | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Posters; printed publications, namely, educational materials, reports, brochures, pamphlets, books, regarding risk assessment and injury prevention and bookmarks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, shorts; hats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Promoting public awareness of the need for safety and risk management of injury prevention | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | Charitable fund-raising * in the field of injury prevention * ; risk management services in the field of injury prevention | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely providing lectures and seminars in the field of injury prevention | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Smartrisk Foundation
- Other trademarks owned by Smartrisk Foundation
- Other trademarks owned by Smartrisk Foundation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SMARTRISK HEROES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |