USPTO serial 78261054
FANTASY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FANTASY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert H. Ware & Milton M. Oliver
ROBERT H WARE & MILTON M OLIVER WARE, FRESSOLA, VDS & ADOLPHSON LLP755 MAIN ST BLDG 5; PO BOX 224MONROE, CT 06468-0224UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Eau de cologne; perfumes; toilet waters; perfume oils; bath oils; non-medicated body lotions and creams; non-medicated facial lotions and creams; non-medicated hand lotions and creams; after-shave lotions and creams; non-medicated bath and shower gels, milks, salts and lotions; body and facial powders; body soaps and skin cleaning lotions, creams and gels; body deodorants and antiperspirants; sun screen lotions and creams; suntan lotions and creams; lip liners, lipsticks and lip balms; make-up foundations; eyeliners, eyeshadows, blush; nail cleaning solutions, nail polish removers and nail polishes; hand soaps | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2007 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |