USPTO serial 78261322
SPARKART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPARKART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Emeryville, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management consulting services and business strategy consulting services; strategic identity, design and analysis services, namely business consulting relating to corporate identity, brand name development, retail identity and naming of others; market research; advertising design, placement and dissemination for others; design, placement and dissemination of print and electronic media advertisements for others | ACTIVE | Jul 26, 1999 |
| 042 | Consulting services, strategic identity, design and analysis services; namely, product design for others, package design for others, website design for others, and structural package design for others; computer consultation services; custom computer software design and development services for others; website design and development services for others; providing consultation on the use, integration and operation of computer software programs and the updating of computer software program services | ACTIVE | Jul 26, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 23, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 23, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |