Drawing for FIRST TEAM ESTATES

USPTO serial 78261585

FIRST TEAM ESTATES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIRST TEAM ESTATES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James W. Paul

JAMES W PAUL FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT, LLPHOWARD HUGHES CTR 6060 CTR DRLOS ANGELES, CA 90045UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Real estate brokerage services, real estate listings and mortgage brokerage services; real estate service, real estate listings and mortgage brokerage services by means of a global computer networkACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 8, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 8, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 24, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Mar 21, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 9, 2006PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED
Dec 28, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 28, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Dec 27, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 27, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Oct 27, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 27, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 31, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 31, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 30, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 15, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Mar 15, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Feb 18, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 18, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 20, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 23, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance