USPTO serial 78261996
HIGHLITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 2, 2004
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HIGHLITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Luton, Bedfordshire, LU1 1TD, GB
Luton, Bedfordshire, LU1 1TD, GB
Luton, Bedfordshire, LU1 1TD, GB
LUTON, BEDFORDSHIRE, GB
LUTON, BEDFORDSHIRE, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monica B. Richman
Monica B. Richman Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP875 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Lifting and moving equipment for disabled persons, namely, hoists, lifting frames and parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Huntleigh Technology PLC
- Other trademarks owned by Huntleigh Technology PLC
- Other trademarks owned by Huntleigh Technology PLC
- Other trademarks owned by HUNTLEIGH TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by HUNTLEIGH TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named HIGHLITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 17, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |