USPTO serial 78262349
ARME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
C-8 HACKENSACK, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua S. Broitman
JOSHUA S BROITMAN OSTRAGER CHONG FLAHERTY & BROITMAN PC250 PARK AVE STE 825NEW YORK, NY 10177-0899UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY OVERALLS, PANTS, TROUSERS, SLACKS, SUITS, SHIRTS, VESTS, JACKETS, COATS, SWEATERS, SHORTS, JUMPSUITS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEATSHORTS, SWEATSUITS, JERSEYS, JOGGING SUITS, ROMPERS, TANK TOPS, HATS, BELTS, BLOUSES, DRESSES, SKIRTS, VESTS, BODYSUITS, BEACH COVERUPS, BATHING SUITS, CULOTTES, CAFTANS, PAJAMAS, NIGHTGOWNS, BATHROBES, SCARVES, GLOVES, LEOTARDS, SOCKS, HOSIERY, STOCKINGS, LEGGINGS, PANTY HOSE, TIGHTS, UNDERWEAR, BIKINIS, BRAS, PANTIES, SLIPS, CAMISOLES, HALTER TOPS, LINGERIE, GARTER BELTS, GIRDLES, BUSTIERS, CORSETS AND SHOES IN INTERNATIONAL CLASS 25 | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 16, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |