USPTO serial 78262380
ONE PUSH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONE PUSH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PHILIP T BESIROF
EDWARD W GRAY JR MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 5500WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1888UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Equipment used in providing telecommunications services, namely, mobile radios, two-way radios, cellular telephones, digital cellular telephones, mobile telephones, dispatch radios, radio pagers, mobile dispatch radios, mobile data receivers and transmitters and handheld units for the wireless receipt and transmission of voice, data, video, music and pictures, namely, handheld personal computers and personal digital assistants (PDAs); hardware and software for use in communications networks, namely, software and Internet protocol and telecommunications network transmitters, receivers, converters, and routers, all of which allow the user to send voice, data, pictures, music and video over wireless networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, electronic, electric and digital transmission of voice, data, pictures, music and video via wireless networks; two-way radio dispatching services, electronic transmission of voice, text, images, data, music and information by means of two-way radios, mobile radios, cellular telephones, digital cellular telephones, mobile telephones, handheld units, namely, personal computers and digital assistants (PDAs), dispatch radios, and pagers; paging services; mobile telephone communication services; wireless Internet access services; and wireless data services for mobile devices via a wireless network for the purpose of sending and receiving electronic mail, facsimiles, data, images, music, information, text, numeric messaging and text messaging and for accessing a global communications network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2004 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |