Drawing for PA LA LA LA POLLY

USPTO serial 78262673

PA LA LA LA POLLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3221237Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 27, 2007
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with PA LA LA LA POLLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

IRENE K. CHONG

IRENE K. CHONG MATTEL, INC.333 CONTINENTAL BLVD.M1-1518EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing entertainment services namely, online games and activities featuring stories, games, interactive activities for children; television entertainment services namely, the production and distribution of animated and live-action motion picture films, and television programs; production of pre-recorded audio and video cassettes, audio and video tapes, audio and video compact discs and phonograph records featuring motion picture films and television productions intended for childrenSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Sep 10, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 10, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 31, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 6, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 4, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 30, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 8, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 24, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 20, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 18, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 8, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 21, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance