USPTO serial 78263379
X BASE BACKPACKERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2941617Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 19, 2005
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with X BASE BACKPACKERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sydney, New South Wales 2000, AU
Sydney, New South Wales 2000, AU
Syney, New South Wales 2000, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David S. D'Ascenzo
David S. D'Ascenzo DASCENZO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.C.522 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 925Portland, OR 97204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Providing and arranging accommodations, namely, hostel, hotel and motel accommodations and making hostel, hotel and motel reservations for others [; providing food and drink, namely, catering, restaurant and bar services.] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |