USPTO serial 78263714
MISSION-FOR-CHILDREN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MISSION-FOR-CHILDREN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN FLEIT
MARTIN FLEIT FLEIT KAIN GIBBONS GUTMAN BONGINI & BIAN21355 E DIXIE HWY STE 115MIAMI, FL 33180UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely men's, women's, and children's pants, slacks, trousers, jeans, shorts, overalls, shirts, t-shirts, blouses, vests, skirts, jackets, coats, sport coats, sweaters, sweatshirts, sweatpants, hats, ties, belts, socks, shoes, caps, and tops. ; clothing, namely men's, women's, and children's pants, slacks, trousers, jeans, shorts, overalls, shirts, t-shirts, blouses, vests, skirts, jackets, coats, sport coats, sweaters, sweatshirts, sweatpants, hats, ties, belts, socks, shoes, caps, and tops | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | financial sponsorship of humanitarian aid programs, charitable fund raising; financial sponsorship of humanitarian aid programs, charitable fund raising | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |