USPTO serial 78263718
THE ENGINEERING FRAMEWORK FOR PRODUCT DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2996160Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2005
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE ENGINEERING FRAMEWORK FOR PRODUCT DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew R. Basile, Registration No. 24,753
ANDREW R BASILE REGISTRATION NO 24 75 YOUNG & BASILE, PCSTE 6243001 W BIG BEAVER RDTROY, MI 48084-3107Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR DESIGN ENGINEERING OF NEW PRODUCTS, FOR THE CREATION, SIMULATION AND TESTING OF NEW PRODUCT DESIGNS, FOR STANDARDIZATION AND AUTOMATION OF PROCESS STEPS IN FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS EVENTS, FOR STANDARDIZATION AND AUTOMATION OF PRODUCT ENGINEERING REPORT GENERATION, FOR KINEMATICS ANALYSIS OF NEW PRODUCT DESIGNS AND MECHANISMS, FOR FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS IN PRODUCT DESIGN ENGINEERING, FOR SOLIDS MODELING PRE- AND POST- PROCESSOR HAVING SOLUTION FOR FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS, FOR FINITE ELEMENT TOPOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY, SIZE AND SHAPE, AND MULTI-DISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION IN PRODUCT DESIGN ENGINEERING, FOR SOLIDS MODELING PRE- AND POST- PROCESSOR HAVING SOLUTION FOR TOPOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY, SIZE AND SHAPE OPTIMIZATION, AND MULTI-DISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION FOR SCIENTIFIC CHARTING AND GRAPHING TOOL IN PRODUCT DESIGN ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PRODUCT DESIGN ENGINEERING IN MANUFACTURING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 29, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |