USPTO serial 78264195
PAMPA CRAFTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PAMPA CRAFTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M COLLEN COLLEN IP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.THE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG 80 SOSSINING, NY 10562UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Silver ornaments, rings being jewelry, works of art, namely, sculpture made of precious metal, jewelry, bracelets, brooches, jewelry chains, decorative boxes made of precious metal, candlesticks of precious metal, household containers of precious metal, epergnes of precious metal, kitchen containers of precious metal, salad bowls of precious metal, necklaces, charms, statuettes of precious metal, cufflinks, belt buckles of precious metal, medallions | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Beach bags, hand bags, traveling bags, riding saddles for animals, business cases of leather or leather board, briefcases, collars for animals, leather haversacks, bandoliers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vedoya, Joaquin
- Other trademarks owned by Sanjurjo de Vedoya, Amalia Eloisa
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named PAMPA CRAFTS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |