Drawing for BLING BLING

USPTO serial 78264212

BLING BLING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLING BLING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sana Hakim, Esq.

SANA HAKIM ESQ BELL, BOYD & LLOYD LLCPO BOX 1135CHICAGO, IL 60690-1135UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009gaming machines,namely, slot machines with or without video output or video lottery terminalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 18, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 17, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 9, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 31, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 30, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 26, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 25, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 24, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 14, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance