Drawing for SIERRA HOME COLLECTIONS

USPTO serial 78264325

SIERRA HOME COLLECTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIERRA HOME COLLECTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan L. Masetti; Thomas H. Zellerbach; Diana Rutowski

SUSAN L MASETTI; THOMAS H ZELLERBACH ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP4 PARK PLZ STE 1600IRVINE, CA 92614-2558UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Toss pillows, bed pillows, hampers, magazine racks, non-metal chests, and cabinetsACTIVE—
021wastebaskets and laundry basketsACTIVEJan 20, 2002
024Bedding, namely, sheets, dust ruffles, quilts, shams, down comforters, feather beds, comforter covers, blankets, blanket throws, and towelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 26, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 7, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 7, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 23, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 30, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 24, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 22, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 22, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 22, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 22, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 22, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 17, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 7, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 27, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 2, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 16, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance