Drawing for Serial No. 78264755

USPTO serial 78264755

Serial No. 78264755

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78264755?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laurel V. Dineff

LAUREL V DINEFF DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED160 N WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat in general.; Meat in general.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 27, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 27, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 22, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 22, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 8, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 2, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 12, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 3, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 3, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 6, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance