USPTO serial 78264988
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen K. Hammond
KAREN K HAMMOND PORTER, WRIGHT, MORRIS & ARTHUR LLP41 S HIGH STCOLUMBUS, OH 43215UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Concrete bonding adhesive to penetrate pores of old concrete, forming a chemical bond for new concrete overlays; acrylic fortifier for concrete; acrylic cure and seal for concrete | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | Protective fiberglass-reinforced exterior coating for insulation panels to help prevent heat loss; waterproofing paint for use in the masonry industry; colorant to add to dry cement mix. | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | Tile and grout cleaning preparations, concrete and asphalt cleaning preparations for masonry, mortar and grout. | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Silicone tile and grout sealant | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Vinyl concrete patcher; plaster patching composition; blacktop patching material for repairing holes and cracks on driveways; weather resistant crack filler composed of asphalt, concrete and acrylic for use in filling asphalt, concrete and acrylic cement namely, solvent weld cement that causes plastic pieces to bond to each other; asphalt emulsion driveway crack filler for filling thin cracks in blacktop, driveways, patios and between foundations and walks; crack sealant made of a blended latex emulsion to adhere to concrete surfaces for filling cracks in sidewalks, steps, patios, decks, and appliance platforms; coal-tar pitch emulsion driveway sealer fortified with oil-proof rubber and latex form for use in protecting bituminous pavement exposed to jet fuels, kerosene, gasoline and similar petroleum products. | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 13, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |