USPTO serial 78265737
M!RIFEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 29, 2005
- Examiner
- JOYNER, CHARLES G
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with M!RIFEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CLEVELAND, OH
Strongsville, OH
Strongsville, OH
Strongsville, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip R. Zender,
PHILIP R. ZENDER, SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEY L.L.P.275 BATTERY STREETSUITE 2600SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management services, consulting, planning and the provision of information related thereto; business marketing consultation; commercial business and business consulting and the provision of information related thereto; business consulting regarding mergers and acquisitions; cost/price analysis; market analysis; business evaluations of information technology; assistance to management of commercial activities and conducting market research surveys; Business research in the field of commercial activities; preparing and drafting business expert reports; business consulting in the area of trade in technological products; providing information related to consulting in the area of enterprise organization | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 1998 |
| 042 | Providing information regarding information technology and use and application of computers and computer systems; providing information regarding consulting with respect to information technology and use and application of computers and computer systems; consultation regarding use and application of computers, computer systems and development of computer systems; development of computer systems; consultation on information technology; development of computer software and Internet exploitation software and hardware; installation, maintenance and updating of software for others; mediation between companies in respect to information systems; business mediation for the procurement of computer hardware and software for third parties; Computer project management services, namely, administrative management of projects in the field of developing, specifying, installing and implementing information systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN COPY EQUIPMENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Mirifex Systems LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Mirifex Systems LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Mirifex Systems LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named M!RIFEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 7, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 2, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |