USPTO serial 78265810
HI-SPEED CERTIFIED USB ON-THE-GO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HI-SPEED CERTIFIED USB ON-THE-GO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan D. Berney-Key,
SUSAN D BERNEY-KEY COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP777 6TH ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20001-3706UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers and computer hardware, integrated circuits, television set top boxes, computer game consoles, computer peripherals, and consumer electronics equipment, namely, cameras, camcorders, audio and video recorders and players, MP3 players, CD recorders and players, DVD recorders and players, cellular phones, personal digital assistants, and global positioning systems consisting of computers, computer software, transmitters, receivers, and network interface devices; and electronic measurement and test instruments for designing and testing the performance, features, compatibility, interoperability, functionality, compliance and adherence to industry standards of the foregoing devices, components and systems; computer cables and connectors; computer software for use in the operation of all of the foregoing; computer software for testing the performance, features, compatibility, interoperability, functionality, compliance and adherence to industry standards of computers, electronics and telecommunications products; user manuals distributed therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Universal Serial Bus Implementers Forum, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Universal Serial Bus Implementers Forum, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named HI-SPEED CERTIFIED USB ON-THE-GO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2009 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 6, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |