USPTO serial 78266775
RELATIONSHIP TREE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BALDWIN, SCOTT
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RELATIONSHIP TREE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KARIN SEGALL
KARIN SEGALL DARBY & DARBY PCPO BOX 5257NEW YORK, NY 10150-5257UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting in the nature of providing merger and acquisition consulting services in the field of business; acquisition and merger consultation | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial services provided over a global computer network, namely, commercial and investment banking; investment services, namely, financial investment and investment consultation in the fields of funds, mutual funds, real estate, commodity, capital, securities, bonds, and annuities; financial consulting in the field of finance; providing an on-line electronic database over a global computer network in the field of financial information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2004 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |