Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78267126?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78267126. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns BOTTEGA ORGANICA?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78267126, the listed owner(s) include: Lemage Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 78267126?

Serial number 78267126 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark BOTTEGA ORGANICA. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of BOTTEGA ORGANICA?

BOTTEGA ORGANICA (78267126) currently shows USPTO status code 601 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover BOTTEGA ORGANICA?

The public record lists International Classes: 043. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78267126

BOTTEGA ORGANICA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601

Filing date: Jun 25, 2003
Status date: Feb 22, 2007
Registration date: —
Examiner: SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOTTEGA ORGANICA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Lemage Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Lemage Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KATHRYN E SMITH

KATHRYN E SMITH WOOD HERRON & EVANS LLP441 VINE STCINCINNATI, OH 45202-2806UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
043	Restaurants featuring organically grown foods	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Feb 22, 2007	MAB1	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT	—
Feb 22, 2007	ABN1	ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED	—
Feb 22, 2007	EXAR	TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED	—
Aug 30, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Aug 8, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Aug 8, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 9, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 8, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Dec 30, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 30, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jun 28, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2005	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jan 24, 2005	UNPR	UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jan 24, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Aug 18, 2004	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Aug 11, 2004	EMRV	EMAIL RECEIVED	—
Feb 4, 2004	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2004	EMRV	EMAIL RECEIVED	—
Jan 5, 2004	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 22, 2003	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2003	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—