USPTO serial 78267525
VM BEAUTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3024392Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 6, 2005
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VM BEAUTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Barrington, IL
Barrington, IL
Barrington, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia B. Stevens
Fred Weinert330 E. Main StreetBarrington, IL 60010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Fragrances for personal use, cosmetics, personal care products, namely, eau de toilette, eau de parfum, lipstick, lip liner, foundation, bronzer, eye shadow, blush, mascara, eyeliner, make-up, concealer, pressed powder, lip shimmer, lip lacquer, hand and nail cream, body soak, soap, body scrub, body spray, foot scrub, foot rub, shower gels, leg rub, shimmer body lotion, body lotion, moisturizing body gel, bath salts,body butter, body cream, bath pearls, eye gel, facial scrub, facial moisturizer, make-up remover, facial cleanser, facial protector, facial mud, facial mist, toner, anti-age treatment; and hair care preparations, shampoo, conditioner, hair treatment and hair gel | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Aug 22, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2008 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |