USPTO serial 78267656
YESDVD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3170534Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 14, 2006
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with YESDVD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEE J. EULGEN
LEE J. EULGEN NEAL, GERBER & EISENBERG LLPTWO NORTH LASALLE STREET, SUITE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for the selection, display, and programmable playback of sound, images, text, graphics and multimedia content, not including video-on-demand functionality; computer software for the authoring of digital content onto computer media; computer software for transferring audio, video, photographs, digital and multimedia content on DVD's [ and CD's ] ; computer software for transforming audio, video, photographic and multimedia information and data into digital format, not including video-on-demand functionality | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 14, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 9, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 12, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |