Drawing for PAD

USPTO serial 78267869

PAD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas D. Bratschun

THOMAS D BRATSCHUN SWANSON & BRATSCHUN, L.L.C.1745 SHEA CTR DR STE 330HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Conveyors of articles and parts thereof, particularly-- devices for the positioning of elements of conveyors of articles, and in particular devices for the positioning of guide elements for containing, routing, sustaining the transported articles, and parts of such devices; actuator devices for adjusting the position of elements of conveyors of articles, and in particular for adjusting the position of guide elements for containing, routing, sustaining the transported articles, and parts of such devices; systems of guides for conveyors of articles, for containing, routing, sustaining the transported articles, and parts of such systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Oct 20, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 8, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 6, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 6, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 11, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 6, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 31, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2004GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2004CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 17, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 9, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance