CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ATK

USPTO serial 78268017

ATK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2932766Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 15, 2005
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marc J. Randazza, Esq.

Marc J. Randazza, Esq. Weston, Garrou, Walters & Mooney781 Douglas AvenueAltamonte Springs, FL 32714UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services namely providing adult entertainment in the nature of images, articles and video footage relating to female modelsSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDNov 1, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 30, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 12, 2005C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
May 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 1, 2005C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Apr 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 8, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Nov 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 11, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 2, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance