USPTO serial 78268219
AUTOMOTIVE IMMUNE SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUTOMOTIVE IMMUNE SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M. Natland
SUSAN M NATLAND KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLPFOURTEENTH FL2040 MAIN STIRVINE, CA 92614Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE AUTOMOTIVE FIELD FOR THE PURPOSES OF DETECTING DEFECTIVE AUTOMOTIVE PARTS AND IDENTIFYING WARRANTY FRAUD | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTATION SERVICES FOR OTHERS IN THE AUTOMOTIVE FIELD FOR THE PURPOSES OF DETECTING DEFECTIVE AUTOMOTIVE PARTS AND IDENTIFYING WARRANTY FRAUD; INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER NETWORKS FOR OTHERS IN THE AUTOMOTIVE FIELD FOR THE PURPOSES OF DETECTING DEFECTIVE AUTOMOTIVE PARTS AND IDENTIFYING WARRANTY FRAUD; INSTALLATION AND INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS IN THE AUTOMOTIVE FIELD FOR THE PURPOSES OF DETECTING DEFECTIVE AUTOMOTIVE PARTS AND IDENTIFYING WARRANTY FRAUD; CUSTOM COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS IN THE AUTOMOTIVE FIELD FOR THE PURPOSES OF DETECTING DEFECTIVE AUTOMOTIVE PARTS AND IDENTIFYING WARRANTY FRAUD | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Syncata Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Syncata Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AUTOMOTIVE IMMUNE SYSTEM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |