USPTO serial 78268528
THE SMARTER WAY TO PAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE SMARTER WAY TO PAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter Katz, Esq.
PETER KATZ ESQ DAY, BERRY & HOWARD LLPONE INTERNATIONAL PLBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Contacted and contactless encoded smart cards and magnetically encoded cards, both containing unique identifiers and attributes associated with specific consumers or assigned users; card readers; application software using such cards for the purposes of customer identification and recording customer preferences and enabling remote electronic payment and commercial transactions in the fields of sports venues, entertainment, and restaurants; an electronic transponder containing information in the nature of a unique radio frequency identification code used to authorize commercial transactions, provide identification, authenticate individuals, match customers to a profile containing preferences for services, payment and rewards programs, and process payment and identification transactions | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | KEY CHAINS AND KEY FOBS, NOT OF METAL | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing an internet web site featuring customer business data and consumer loyalty information; business marketing consulting services for others; conducting marketing studies for others; business services, namely facilitation of transaction authorization in the nature of integrated tracking and management of commercial transactions via a radio frequency communications with an encoded chip-card token | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Verification of identification, namely, unique customer number verification in the nature of providing user authentication services in consumer purchase, attendance or admittance transactions; collection and collation of information, namely, customer authentication services in consumer purchase, attendance or admittance transactions using radio frequency communications with an encoded chip-card token to evaluate, analyze and collect service data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SMART System Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SMART System Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named THE SMARTER WAY TO PAY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 19, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |